FCA reveals findings from first cryptoassets consumer research

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published two pieces of research looking at UK consumer attitudes to cryptoassets, such as Bitcoin or Ether. The research includes qualitative interviews with UK consumers and a national survey.

The qualitative research indicated some potential harm, including that many consumers may not fully understand what they are purchasing. For example, several of those interviewed talked of wanting to buy a ‘whole’ coin, suggesting they did not realise they could buy part of a cryptoasset. Despite this lack of understanding, the cryptoasset owners interviewed were often looking for ways to ‘get rich quick’, citing friends, acquaintances and social media influencers as key motivations for buying cryptoassets.

Both the survey and qualitative research found that some cryptoasset owners made their purchases without completing any research beforehand.

However, despite the general poor understanding of cryptoassets amongst UK consumers, findings from the survey suggest that currently the overall scale of harm may not be as high as previously thought.

73% of UK consumers surveyed don’t know what a ‘cryptocurrency’ is or are unable to define it – those most aware of them are likely to be men aged between 20 and 44. The FCA estimates only 3% of consumers it surveyed had ever bought cryptoassets. Of the small sub-sample of consumers who had bought cryptoassets, around half spent under £200 – a large majority of these said they had financed the purchases through their disposable income.

Bitcoin appears to be the favourite cryptoasset for consumers with more than 50% of the cryptoasset owner survey sub-sample reporting to have spent their money on this product, while one in three chose Ether.

The FCA has previously warned that cryptoassets, including Bitcoin for instance, are highly volatile and risky. Many tokens (including Bitcoin and ‘cryptocurrency’ equivalents) are not currently regulated in the UK. This means that the transfer, purchase and sale of such tokens currently fall outside the FCA’s regulatory remit. This means it is unlikely that consumers will be entitled to make complaints to the Financial Ombudsman Service or protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme if things go wrong.

The FCA is working with the Government and Bank of England, as part of a UK Cryptoassets Taskforce, to understand and address the harms from cryptoassets and encourage innovation in the interests of consumers. The FCA is currently consulting on guidance to clarify the types of cryptoassets that fall within the existing regulatory perimeter. Later this year the FCA will consult on banning the sale of certain cryptoasset derivatives to retail investors. HM Treasury is also exploring legislative change to potentially broaden the FCA’s regulatory remit to bring in further types of cryptoassets. This could include more detailed investigations into specific firms, individuals or practices.

Further information:
To read more, please follow these links:

Revealing Reality’s report to the FCA: ‘How and why consumers buy cryptoassets’.
https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research/how-and-why-consumers-buy-cryptoassets.pdf

FCA Consumer Survey Research Report: ‘Cryptoassets: Ownership and attitudes in the UK’
https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research/cryptoassets-ownership-attitudes-uk-consumer-survey-research-report.pdf

Contact us here


Other articles

ESMA published advice to EU institutions on ICOs and crypto-assets

ESMA published advice to EU institutions on ICOs and crypto-assets

Cryptoassets Taskforce publishes final report on UK’s regulatory approach to cryptoassets

Cryptoassets Taskforce publishes final report on UK’s regulatory approach to cryptoassets

FSB sets out potential financial stability implications from crypto-assets

FSB sets out potential financial stability implications from crypto-assets

Please Note: This publication is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Readers should take legal advice before applying the information contained in this publication to specific issues or transactions

Skip to toolbar